Slow Parenting
Monday, June 1, 2009
"Let the Kid Be." That was the headline topping Lisa Belkin's essay in this Sunday's New York Times Magazine. Perhaps, the piece suggested, we've at last moved beyond "Get-them-into-Harvard-or-bust parenting," perhaps beyond, even, the bad mother confessionals that Ayelet Waldman and a host of bloggers have lately been promoting. Indeed, writes Belkin, a "second wave has taken hold—writers are moving past merely venting and trying to gather the like-minded into a new movement" that some call "slow parenting" and some "free-range parenting" and, if one were to bottom line it, might be defined simply as giving children room to be themselves, as opposed to the resume-building, fear-rattled citizens of a dog-eat-dog world.
Just five years ago, when I published Seeing Past Z: Nurturing the Imagination in a Fast-Forward World, there was, I will be frank, little public interest in the argument that I made within those pages—that it was time to let our children be, that it was our job as parents to open doors, not prescribe pathways, that stories and storytelling were the gifts that we parents must pass on. "I want to raise my son to pursue wisdom over winning," I wrote. "I want him to channel his passions and talents and personal politics into rivers of his choosing. I’d like to take the chance that I feel it is my right to take on contentment over credentials, imagination over conquest, the idiosyncratic point of view over the standard-issue one. I’d like to live in a world where that’s okay."
Perhaps we've entered that era now. Perhaps, with new books such as The Idle Parent: Why Less Means More When Raising Kids (Tom Hodgkinson) leading the charge, certain freedoms will be granted—less Suzuki, for example, more afternoons spent wandering along the banks of the mud-rimmed creek. At least until, as Belkin points out, the next parenting movement edges onto the horizon.